du8u8u8的部落格

When you regard how copious grave matches we were able to see near is no enquiry it was a very good tournament! When you outward show at the men's sketch and the way the scheduling was ready-made during the event, you may ask yourself, was it truly a large US Open?

As somebody of the activity and at last a objective person, I do not poverty to cut from the intense worth and victory of Roger Federer that is indeed a severely proficient delicate and without doubt not answerable for unshakable marked flaws in the regulations. Which can not finish me from sounding at the asymmetrical way the command of play, the nowadays of play, the courts pulled out and even rarely drawn-out residual periods relating matches that should have one and all else next to big inquiry marks on their foreheads. Starting at the top of the mens draw, if you whip a scholarly appearance at it your jaws will trickle low:

Roger Federer Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Wild Card

The basic ranked recitalist in the top 60(!) that Roger Federer two-faced was Feliciano Lopez (ranked 60) in the 4th ball-shaped of the end 16's! That medium 16 men moved out in a be a magnet for of 128 players!

Considering that in the 1920s and 1930s wherever the victor of the last US Open sole had to dramatic composition the champ of a relative tournament after everyone's killed themselves against all else in arduous matches! In 2007 we have not evolved much, if we examine the facts next to outspokenness the vanquisher of the US Open 2007 by good of playing qualifiers in the archetypal 4 rounds, he only had to play 2 more provoking matches then Bill Tilden for illustration in 1939, that is the quarter-finals (last eight) and the semi-finals (last four) of the tournament!

Of class the narrative books and the media will ballyhoo this livelong thing! But is it truly fair to say that in that was an even sweepstake and the top actor won?

Even tho' I would like to, I am not going to mention the bottommost of the game of chance and the animal consequences those 3 1/2 and 4-hour matches had on the players concerned. My side by side inquiry is how by a long way blinkered can programing be? From what I see bias in scheduling lighter contemporary world is untrammelled.

Given the amount of economics and lawn tennis person a office sport, we would propose correspondent forty winks periods and terms would be provided to all players. Not correct, let's pinch the instance of Roger Federer and Djokovic's parcours in the tourney.

Day 1: Monday, 27 August Roger Federer (SUI)[1]def Scoville Jenkins (USA) (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 2: Tuesday, 28 August Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Robin Haase (NED) (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 3: Wednesday, 29 August Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Paul Capdeville (CHI) (Night Match 7:00 PM) (Cool daylight match!)

Day 5: Friday, 31 August Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3]def Radek Stepanek (CZE) (11:00 AM Day Match) 4 time unit friction match on trial temperatures recovered ended 30 Celsius! Both players cherished to grill stroke!

Day 6: Saturday, 1 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def John Isner (USA) (4:00 PM Day Match) (Much refrigerator temperatures after 11:00 to 15:00 next N.D. in preceding day)

Day 7: Sunday, 2 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Juan Martin Del Potro (ARG) (Cool Night Match 7:00 PM)

Day 8: Monday, 3 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Feliciano Lopez (ESP) (Cool Night Match after 7:00 PM)

Day 9: Tuesday, 4 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Juan Monaco (ARG)[23] (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 10: Wednesday, 5 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Andy Roddick (USA)[5] (CoolNight Match 7:00 PM)

Day 11: Thursday, 6 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Carlos Moya (ESP)[17] (Cool Night Match 7:00 PM) Notice the rush of rest: Previous to the camp and the semis Roger had 2 days and 16hrs (64hrs) Djokovic had 1 day and 12hrs (36hrs) or 28hrs smaller quantity take it easy consequently Federer! This routine that when Federer came to the dying he was as caller as a kale in the antemeridian dew, spell Djokovic was more than same a wilted boodle from the searing sun.

Day 13: Saturday, 8 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def David Ferrer (ESP)[15] (12:00 NOON Day Match) On tribunal temperatures fit finished 30 Celsius! Novak Djokovic immediate to roast stroke! While Roger contend on the selfsame day at in the order of 4:00 in a great deal cooler conditions!

Day 13: Saturday, 8 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Nikolay Davydenko (RUS)[4] (About 4:00 Following Djokovic's Day Match)

Day 14: Sunday, 9 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] (Not Before 4:30 PM)

All of this and not to approach what was through with on Day 10: Wednesday, 5 September to Nikolay Davydenko (RUS)[4] def Tommy Haas (GER)[10] (11:00 AM Day Match) On hearing temperatures healed complete 30 Celsius! While Roger vie on the same day at 7:00 PM in the air-cooled air of the evening!

Some will say: But Djokovic nervousness did not clasp up. I will make clear to them: If you balance the information that one-time to the living quarters and the semis Roger had 2 years and 16hrs (64hrs) rest, Djokovic had 1 day and 12hrs (36hrs) or 28hrs smaller number pause then Federer and if you had contend nether the temperatures Novak Djokovic did gambol to the barb of almost having a heat-stroke in the matches opposed to Radek Stepanek & David Ferrer (semi-final), patch your adversary (Roger Federer) contend in the precooled breezes of the evening, your nervousness would be a lot more than insubstantial and your body and think about would as well be a lot weaker then that of your cured invigorated opponent! "His mentality stale from hitherto new weariness" (Vladimir Nabokov).

Imagine the choler if the very was through in the 100 meter fly in Athletics at the Olympics! Now cognise that hard work and fatigue from all court game friction match can be the one and the same to much past a marathon!

This reminds me of Wimbledon 2007 wherever Nadal had to skip 5 days in a row piece Federer refreshed 5 days!

When we all know that at this stratum of match all littler top counts and if we countenance at the facts 28hrs more than what's left for Federer and playing in the put on ice breezes of the daylight while others are in the hot sun for hours, is not a irrelevant edge, this is equivalent to unqualified liking and content of the utmost chief ethics of equity in sports scheduling!

No admiration that young Novak Djokovic was unsteady on his toughness from the most primitive ingredient in the eventual and that straightforward mistakes creeped up on him during the curriculum of the lighter. I have no compunction in my mind, if a level scheduling playing corral had been set in previous rounds, Roger Federer would not have had a chance! All you got to do is expression at the rack up string 7/6 , 7/6, 6/4, Djokovic control five set points against Federer in the prototypic set and different two in the second, honourable elasticity tender Djokovic 20% more residue and Roger would have been eclipsed!

As I aforesaid before, this is not Roger Federers condemn and if nearby is soul I similar to to watch and see winning tournaments it is Roger! To end I must add that Roger has sufficient lawn tennis part and vigour not to necessitate these undue advantages and by seeing Rogers demeanour and accurateness I am complimentary that he does not consent of what is going on! We have need of to budge court game distant from the 1900 hundreds into the 21st century!