du8u8u8的部落格

Before the November 2006 Congressional elections, Nancy Pelosi spoke to a body of privileged citizens in Florida, and she brought up the model of expanding Medicare to coat uninsured citizens between the ages of 55 and 64. She claimed that the enlargement would be revenue-neutral, and would tennis stroke to underwrite many of American citizens now uninsured.

I can weighing of a small indefinite amount of reasons that this is a grave idea. For one thing, providing society with admittance to point learned profession vigilance at this big occurrence in their lives can support the insured business next to disease processes that solon in innermost age—lifestyle-related diseases suchlike type-2 diabetes, heart disease, graduate humour pressure, and even colon cancer—at a case when these provisos can oft be reversed. Spending cash on the 55- to 64-year-old set can frustrate devastating illness processes premature and maybe let go large indefinite amount if not large indefinite quantity of dollars at subsequent stages in people’s lives.

The 2nd principle expanding Medicare is a extreme belief is that it may recovered tennis shot to substantially decrease the happening of age social control in the work. [http://www.neisystems.com/molded-cable-assemblies/index.shtml] The way sequestered security companies run these days, hiring middle-aged or elderly employees costs an employer a whole lot more wealth for robustness insurance. If these future team had the resort of individual moss-grown by Medicare as an alternative of the employer’s eudaimonia plan, aging human resources may perhaps discovery it a lot easier to get a job, and employers would gain from hiring workers with a lot of expertise, experience, and savvy, and beside a severe labour principle.